Journal
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 6
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 407-427Publisher
ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012439
Keywords
ecolabel; quality; differentiation; asymmetric information; policy; trade
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Labels address a market failure-asymmetric information-through costly expenditures borne by consumers, firms, and taxpayers. In this review, we explore when mandatory and voluntary labeling policies may be socially optimal. Although the analysis ostensibly revolves around simple comparisons of labeling costs and the subsequent benefits from improved information symmetry, more symmetric information may alter social welfare in other ways, e.g., by altering the production of externalities, the exercise of market power, or expenditures on rent-seeking activities. We review work that contributes to a more complete analysis of the relative merits of mandatory and voluntary labeling; that assesses the distribution of welfare effects across affected groups; and that discusses political economy issues, particularly in the context of voluntary labels in international trade. We summarize key patterns of results concerning the relative desirability of mandatory and voluntary labels and discuss likely future directions in this evolving literature.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available