4.2 Article

Fine-structural variance of family 3 carbohydrate-binding modules as extracellular biomass-sensing components of Clostridium thermocellum anti-σI factors

Journal

Publisher

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S139900471302926X

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [715/12, 500/10, 1349/13]
  2. Sidney E. Frank Foundation through the Israel Science Foundation [24/11]
  3. US-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF)
  4. Israeli Center of Research Excellence (I-CORE Center) Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee [152/11]
  5. Ministry of Environmental Protection
  6. Grand Technion Energy Program, comprising part of The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The anaerobic, thermophilic, cellulosome-producing bacterium Clostridium thermocellum relies on a variety of carbohydrate-active enzymes in order to efficiently break down complex carbohydrates into utilizable simple sugars. The regulation mechanism of the cellulosomal genes was unknown until recently, when genomic analysis revealed a set of putative operons in C. thermocellum that encode sigma(I) factors (i.e. alternative sigma factors that control specialized regulon activation) and their cognate anti-sigma(I) factor (RsgI). These putative anti-sigma(I)-factor proteins have modules that are believed to be carbohydrate sensors. Three of these modules were crystallized and their three-dimensional structures were solved. The structures show a high overall degree of sequence and structural similarity to the cellulosomal family 3 carbohydrate-binding modules (CBM3s). The structures of the three carbohydrate sensors (RsgI-CBM3s) and a reference CBM3 are compared in the context of the structural determinants for the specificity of cellulose and complex carbohydrate binding. Fine structural variations among the RsgI-CBM3s appear to result in alternative substrate preferences for each of the sensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available