4.4 Article

Clinical value of total white blood cells and neutrophil counts in patients with suspected appendicitis: retrospective study

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-7-32

Keywords

Acute appendicitis; Diagnosis; White blood cells; Histological diagnosis; Neutrophil count; Receiver operating characteristic curves

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Acute appendicitis (AA) is common surgical problem associated with acute-phase reaction. Blood tests role in decision-making process is unclear. This retrospective study aimed to determine diagnostic value of preoperativeevaluation of white blood cells (WBCs) and neutrophils and its value in predicting AA severity. Methods: Medical records of 456 patients who underwent appendectomy during 4-years period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were subdivided according to histological finding into: normal appendix (n = 29), uncomplicated inflamed appendix (n = 350), complicated appendicitis (n = 77). Diagnostic performances of WBCs and neutrophils were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: WBCs and neutrophils counts were higher in patients with inflamed and complicated appendix than normal appendix and in complicated than inflamed appendix. In patients, WBCs count 9.400 x 10(3)/mL had sensitivity of 76.81%, specificity of 65.52%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.0%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 16.1%, positive likelihood ratio [LR(+)] of 2.23, negative LR(-) of 0.35. Neutrophil count 7.540 x 103/mL had sensitivity of 70.96%, specificity of 65.52%, PPV of 96.8%, NPV of 13.3%, LR(+) of 2.06, LR(-) of 0.44. Areas under ROC curve were 0.701, 0.680 for elevated WBCs and neutrophils count. Conclusions: Clinicians should not rely on either elevated WBCs or neutrophils count as appendicitis indicator as clinical data are superior in decision-making appendectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available