4.5 Article

Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13042-015-0433-7

Keywords

Multiple attribute decision making (MADM); Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic values; Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic

Funding

  1. Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [14YJCZH091]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making problem based on the arithmetic and geometric aggregation operators with interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic information. Then, motivated by the ideal of traditional arithmetic and geometric operation, we shall develop some aggregation operators for aggregating interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic information: interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic arithmetic aggregation operators, interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic geometric aggregation operators, interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic correlated aggregation operators, induced interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators, induced interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic correlated aggregation operators, interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic prioritized aggregation operators, interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic power aggregation operators. The prominent characteristic of these proposed operators are studied. Then, we shall utilize these operators to develop some approaches to solve the interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic multiple attribute decision making problems. Finally, a practical example is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available