4.3 Article

Effect of carrier frequency offset and symbol timing offset on the performance of FMT over time-frequency selective channels

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ett.1544

Keywords

FMT; OFDM; time frequency selective fading; carrier frequency offset; symbol timing offset

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory for Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining Technology [SKLCRSM10KFA04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the effects of carrier frequency offset (CFO) and symbol timing offset (STO) in filtered multitone (FMT) systems over time and frequency selective multipath fading channels. The analysis is based on an FMT system using a square-root raised cosine pulse. The performance of FMT systems in the presence of CFO and STO over different fading channels are derived and compared with that of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing systems. The offsets degrade the performance of the FMT systems because they cause filter mismatch. The CFO changes the amplitude frequency characteristic of the receiver filter, while the STO changes the phase frequency characteristic of the receiver filter. The simulations are conducted over different fading channels. To achieve signal-to-interference ratio above 20 dB, over a flat static channel, the frequency offset relative to symbol duration must be less than 5% in the orthogonal frequency division multiplexing system, while the upper limit is 8% in the FMT system. The simulation results also show that the FMT system is less sensitive to CFO in time frequency selective channels. The signal-to-interference ratio expressions help predict the bit-error-rate performance of FMT with single tap subchannel equalization. The analysis also helps synchronization algorithm design after analyzing the synchronization offset effect in FMT systems under certain channel conditions. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available