4.6 Article

Carbon Emissions in China: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the Regional Level

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 6005-6023

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su6096005

Keywords

carbon emissions; spatial Durbin panel data model; spatial externality; Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population; Affluence and Technology (STIRPAT)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China A Research on the Operating Mechanism and Economic Impact of the Pilot Regional Carbon Trading-Based on the Term-Co2 Model [71473242]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB955700]
  3. Chinese Academy of Science Strategic technology Special Project Climate Change and Carbon budget Certification related issue [XDA.05140300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An extended Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence and Technology (STIRPAT) model, incorporating factors that drive carbon emissions, is built from the regional perspective. A spatial Durbin model is applied to investigate the factors, including population, urbanization level, economic development, energy intensity, industrial structure, energy consumption structure, energy price, and openness, that impact both the scale and intensity of carbon emissions. After performing the model, we find that the revealed negative and significant impact of spatial-lagged variables suggests that the carbon emissions among regions are highly correlated. Therefore, the empirical results suggest that the provinces are doing an exemplary job of lowering carbon emissions. The driving factors, with the exception of energy prices, significantly impact carbon emissions both directly and indirectly. We, thus, argue that spatial correlation, endogeneity and externality should be taken into account in formulating polices that seek to reduce carbon emissions in China. Carbon emissions will not be met by controlling economic development, but by energy consumption and low-carbon path.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available