3.8 Article

TiO2 micro-flowers composed of nanotubes and their application to dye-sensitized solar cells

Journal

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-93

Keywords

Dye-sensitized solar cells; TiO2 nanotube; Micro-flowers; Anodizing

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through the Human Resources Training Project for Regional Innovation [NRF-2012H1B8A2026009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TiO2 micro-flowers were made to bloom on Ti foil by the anodic oxidation of Ti-protruding dots with a cylindrical shape. Arrays of the Ti-protruding dots were prepared by photolithography, which consisted of coating the photoresists, attaching a patterned mask, illuminating with UV light, etching the Ti surface by reactive ion etching (RIE), and stripping the photoresist on the Ti foil. The procedure for the blooming of the TiO2 micro-flowers was analyzed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) as the anodizing time was increased. Photoelectrodes of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) were fabricated using TiO2 micro-flowers. Bare TiO2 nanotube arrays were used for reference samples. The short-circuit current (J(sc)) and the power conversion efficiency of the DSCs based on the TiO2 micro-flowers were 4.340 mA/cm(2) and 1.517%, respectively. These values of DSCs based on TiO2 micro-flowers were higher than those of bare samples. The TiO2 micro-flowers had a larger surface area for dye adsorption compared to bare TiO2 nanotube arrays, resulting in improved J(sc) characteristics. The structure of the TiO2 micro-flowers allowed it to adsorb dyes very effectively, also demonstrating the potential to achieve higher power conversion efficiency levels for DSCs compared to a bare TiO2 nanotube array structure and the conventional TiO2 nanoparticle structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available