3.8 Article

Low-temperature growth of highly crystalline β-Ga2O3 nanowires by solid-source chemical vapor deposition

Journal

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-347

Keywords

beta-Ga2O3 nanowires; Chemical vapor deposition; Solid-source; Highly crystalline; Large resistance; Dielectric

Funding

  1. Early Career Scheme of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR, China [CityU139413]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51202205]
  3. Guangdong National Science Foundation [S2012010010725]
  4. Science Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20120618140624228]
  5. Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growing Ga2O3 dielectric materials at a moderately low temperature is important for the further development of high-mobility III-V semiconductor-based nanoelectronics. Here, beta-Ga2O3 nanowires are successfully synthesized at a relatively low temperature of 610 degrees C by solid-source chemical vapor deposition employing GaAs powders as the source material, which is in a distinct contrast to the typical synthesis temperature of above 1,000 degrees C as reported by other methods. In this work, the prepared beta-Ga2O3 nanowires are mainly composed of Ga and O elements with an atomic ratio of approximately 2:3. Importantly, they are highly crystalline in the monoclinic structure with varied growth orientations in low-index planes. The bandgap of the beta-Ga2O3 nanowires is determined to be 251 nm (approximately 4.94 eV), in good accordance with the literature. Also, electrical characterization reveals that the individual nanowire has a resistivity of up to 8.5 x 10(7) Omega cm, when fabricated in the configuration of parallel arrays, further indicating the promise of growing these highly insulating Ga2O3 materials in this III-V nanowire-compatible growth condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available