4.0 Article

COMPARING VARVE COUNTING AND 14C-AMS CHRONOLOGIES IN THE SEDIMENTS OF LAKE ZABINSKIE, NORTHEASTERN POLAND: IMPLICATIONS FOR ACCURATE 14C DATING OF LAKE SEDIMENTS

Journal

GEOCHRONOMETRIA
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 159-171

Publisher

SCIENDO
DOI: 10.1515/geochr-2015-0019

Keywords

lake sediments; varve chronology; AMS C-14 dating; radionuclides; age-depth model

Funding

  1. Switzerland through Swiss Contribution to the enlarged European Union, Project CLIMPOL [PSPB-086/2010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Varved lake sediments from Lake Zabinskie (northeastern Poland) provide a high-resolution calendar-year chronology which allows validation of C-14 dating results. Microscopic analysis of the varve microfacies revealed that laminations found in Lake Zabinskie were biogenic (calcite) varves. Three independent counts indicated a good preservation quality of laminae in the 348 cm long sediment profile which contained 1000(+12)/- 24 varves. The varve chronology was validated with the Cs-137 activity peaks, the tephra horizon from the Askja eruption at AD 1875 and with the timing of major land-use changes of known age inferred from pollen analysis. 32 AMS C-14 dates of terrestrial macrofossils distributed along the profile were compared with the varve chronology. After identification of outliers, the free-shape model performed with 21 14C dates provided the best possible fit with the varve chronology. We observed almost ideal consistency between both chronologies from the present until AD 1250 while in the lower part (AD 1000-1250) the difference increases to ca. 25 years. We demonstrate that this offset can be explained by too old radiocarbon ages of plant remains transported to the lake by the inflowing creek. Results of this study highlight that careful interpretation of radiocarbon age-depth models is necessary, especially in lakes where no annual laminations are observed and no independent method are used for cross-validation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available