3.8 Article

Effects of crystallization and dopant concentration on the emission behavior of TiO2: Eu nanophosphors

Journal

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-1

Keywords

titania nanoparticles; europium doping; optical properties; photoluminescence

Funding

  1. CONACYT, Mexico
  2. VIEP-BUAP through the Red Tematica de Nanociencia y Nanotecnologia
  3. Cuerpo Academico de Materiales Avanzados [BUAP-CA-250]
  4. [VIEP/EXC/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uniform, spherical-shaped TiO2:Eu nanoparticles with different doping concentrations have been synthesized through controlled hydrolysis of titanium tetrabutoxide under appropriate pH and temperature in the presence of EuCl3 center dot 6H(2)O. Through air annealing at 500 degrees C for 2 h, the amorphous, as-grown nanoparticles could be converted to a pure anatase phase. The morphology, structural, and optical properties of the annealed nanostructures were studied using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy [EDS], and UV-Visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy techniques. Optoelectronic behaviors of the nanostructures were studied using micro-Raman and photoluminescence [PL] spectroscopies at room temperature. EDS results confirmed a systematic increase of Eu content in the as-prepared samples with the increase of nominal europium content in the reaction solution. With the increasing dopant concentration, crystallinity and crystallite size of the titania particles decreased gradually. Incorporation of europium in the titania particles induced a structural deformation and a blueshift of their absorption edge. While the room-temperature PL emission of the as-grown samples is dominated by the D-5(0) - F-7(j) transition of Eu+3 ions, the emission intensity reduced drastically after thermal annealing due to outwards segregation of dopant ions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available