4.8 Article

Carbon-coated MnO microparticulate porous nanocomposites serving as anode materials with enhanced electrochemical performances

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 41-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.06.025

Keywords

Manganese oxide; Carbon coating; Cycling stability; Rate capability; Electrochemical performance

Funding

  1. Independent Innovation Foundations of Shandong University [2012ZD001, 2012JC013]
  2. Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130 131110068]
  3. New Century Excellent Talent Program, State Education Ministry [NCET-10-0545]
  4. Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shandong [JQ20 1312]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous manganese oxide (Mn2O3) microspheres have been successfully fabricated through annealing the solvothermal lab-made MnCO3 precursor. Experimental results reveal that polyvinyl-pyrrolidone (PVP) plays a pivotal role in controlling the size and uniformity of the MnCO3 microspheres. The carbon-coated MnO porous microspheres (MnO@C) with a specific surface area of 45.6 m(2) g(-1) and pore size of ca. 30 nm were obtained by carbonization of pyrrole coated porous Mn2O3. The carbon layer with a thickness of ca. 3 nm was deposited on the surface and the inner wall of pores. Electrochemical tests demonstrated that the as-prepared porous MnO@C electrode materials possessed a reversible capacity of 525.4 mAh g(-1) after 100 cycles at a current density of 100 mA g(-1) and the capacities of 590.6, 478.8, 353.8 and 238.2 mAh g(-1) at 100, 200, 400, and 800 mA g(-1), respectively. The MnO@C porous materials exhibit higher cycling and rate performances than the corresponding porous Mn2O3 mainly attributed to the carbon coating, which could efficiently buffer the volume change during the lithiation/delithiation and improve the electronic conductivity among MnO particles. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available