4.8 Article

Freestanding MoO3-x nanobelt/carbon nanotube films for Li-ion intercalation pseudocapacitors

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 355-363

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.08.001

Keywords

MoO3 nanobelts; Pseudocapacitor; Intercalation; Freestanding; Hydrogenated

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51322210, 51002056, 61434001]
  2. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China [201035]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST: 2012YQ025, 2013YQ049, 2013TS160]
  4. WNLO [0118187081]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, Energy Storage Systems Program, through Sandia National Laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) is known as a promising pseudocapacitive material, but low conductivity limits its applications. Hydrogenation is demonstrated to increase the conductivity of MoO3 and hence improve its electrochemical performance. Hydrogenated MoO3 (MoO3-x) shows enhanced conductivity based on, both first principle calculations and single nanobelt measurements. Freestanding MoO3-x/carbon nanotubes (CNT) composite films have been fabricated and showed much improved electrochemical performance compared to composites of CNT and as-synthesized MoO3 (MoO3/CNT). Electrodes showed a specific capacitance of 337 F/g (based on the mass of MoO3-x) and a high volumetric capacitance of 291 F/cm(3) (based on the whole electrode) with excellent rate capability. Also we confirmed that the improved intercalation kinetics and the increased intercalation pseudocapacitance could be attributed to the higher electronic conductivity of MoO3-x, which results in better and faster intercalations of Li+ ions. This electrochemical behavior implies that MoO3-x can serve as a very good negative electrode with high capacitance at high mass loading levels. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available