4.8 Article

Balanced approach to safety of high capacity silicon-germanium-carbon nanotube free-standing lithium ion battery anodes

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 268-275

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.09.007

Keywords

Free-standing anodes; Silicon-germanium anodes; Carbon nanotubes; Thermal safety; Chemical vapor deposition; High energy density

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE- FG36-08 GO88110]
  2. US Government
  3. Intelligence Community Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program through Office of the Director of National Intelligence
  4. GAANN fellowship through the RIT Microsystems Engineering Ph.D. program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electrochemical performance and safety of high capacity free-standing anodes for lithium ion batteries have been enhanced by the addition of silicon to Ge-nanoparticle-single wall carbon nanotube (Ge-NP:SWCNT) hybrid electrodes. Materials characterization of electrodes indicated amorphous silicon was deposited through a low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) process resulting in a reduction in surface area from over 900 m(2)/g to 113 m(2)/g after 70% w/w addition of Si. Electrochemical performance of the electrodes showed extraction capacities over 1200 mAh/g for Si-Ge-NP:SWCNT free-standing anodes with coulombic efficiencies of >85% on the first cycle; this demonstrates a >40% improvement over previous free-standing Ge-NP:SWCNT electrode capacities. The thermal safety of the Si-Ge-NP:SWCNT electrodes, as measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), was also improved over pure SWCNT and Ge-NP:SWCNT electrodes, evidenced by a reduced exothermic energy release. These high capacity free-standing anodes show for the first time the use of nanostructured-tailoring to balance improvements in electrochemical performance and safety. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available