4.8 Article

Carbon deposition on borated alumina supported nano-sized Ni catalysts for dry reforming of CH4

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages 674-686

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.07.011

Keywords

Methane reforming; Borated-alumina; Ni catalysts; Acidity/basicity; OH groups; Carbon suppression

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Council of A*STAR (Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore) [0921380022]
  2. Science and Engineering Research Council of A*STAR (Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore) (NUS RP) [R-279-000-292-305]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Borated alumina supported 5 wt% Ni catalysts with B2O3 loading varying from 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 5 wt% to 10 wt% were prepared and characterized by XRD, H-2-TPR, CO2-TPD, NH3-TPD, in situ DRIFTS study, and evaluated for dry reforming of methane. The addition of B2O3 influences the activity and stability of the catalysts significantly. Ni particle size increases from 5.8 to 9.1 nm with increasing the B2O3 loading from 0 to 10 wt%. In the kinetic control temperature region (700 degrees C) there is no linear relationship between the Ni particle size and the catalyst activity/stability. The formation of strong Lewis acid sites causes severe carbon deposition on 1 wt% and 10 wt% B2O3 loaded Ni catalysts, hence decreasing catalytic activity and stability. The formation of weak Lewis acid sites and O-H groups on 5 wt% B2O3 promoted Ni catalyst is found to significantly facilitate carbon removal and improve the stability of the catalysts. The reaction mechanism of dry reforming of methane over borated-alumina supported Ni catalysts is proposed, especially the promotional effect of OH groups on the suppression of carbon formation being emphasized. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available