4.8 Article

Synthesis of Ca2Mn3O8 films and their electrochemical studies for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) of water

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 282-289

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2011.10.003

Keywords

Water splitting; Calcium manganate; Oxygen evolution reaction; Films; Nano materials; Organic matter decomposition

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03SF0353A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the oxygen evolving mu-oxido-Mn4Ca cluster unit in photosynthesis II, Ca2Mn3O8 films prepared by dip-coating and screen-printing were tested as oxygen evolving catalysts. Structural analysis confirmed that smooth 100 nm films can be grown from a Ca2MnO4 sol-gel solution showing a high orientation in (1 0 0) direction when deposited on F:SnO2/quartz and quartz substrates. The distance found by X-ray diffraction between the layers exactly fitted the monoclinic layer compound of composition Ca2Mn3O8. To compare the electrochemical behavior of this layer with the bulk Ca2Mn3O8 powder, a 6 mu m thick film was prepared by screen-printing. Differential electrochemical mass spectroscopy performed in 0.1 M KH2PO4 at pH 7 and 1 M Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane at pH 7.8 revealed that both films were able to oxidize water as well as organic matter with a good correlation to the slope of the current density curves; however, the dip-coated films displayed lower current densities than the screen-printed Ca2Mn3O8 layers. A closer look into the cyclic voltammetry revealed that capacity values were similar indicating that not only the different surface areas played a role, but variations in the specific capacity values possibly due to the orientation of the films or the manganese mixed valence in the surface as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) could be responsible for these effects. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available