4.2 Article

A Predictive Risk Scoring System for Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Journal

MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages 5719-5728

Publisher

INT SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE, INC
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.911499

Keywords

Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Risk Assessment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81602172]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula remains a challenge after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed to establish a scoring system to predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after PD. Material/Methods: The clinical records of 361 consecutive patients who underwent PD between 2009 and 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into a study group (225 patients) and a validation group (136 patients). CR-POPF was defined and classified based on the 2016 ISGPS definition and classification system. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed and we thus developed a scoring system based on the regression coefficient of the multivariate logistic regression model. The predictive value was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: A predictive scoring system with a maximum of 6 points for CR-POPF was established using the following 4 factors: 1 point for soft pancreatic texture (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.10-3.98, P= 0.025), 1.5 points for main pancreatic duct diameter <= 2.5 mm (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.23-5.99, P=0.013), 0.5 points for extended lymphadenectomy (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.18, P= 0.007), 0.5 points for a 25-30 g/L postoperative day 1 serum albumin (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.00, P= 0.037), and 3 points for postoperative day 1 serum albumin <= 25 g/L (OR 5.12, 95% CI 1.82-14.41, P= 0.002). The ROC curve showed that this scoring system was highly predictive for CR-POPF in the validation group (AUC=0.806, 95% CI: 0.735-0.878). Conclusions: This 6-point risk scoring system will be useful for perioperative risk management of CR-POPF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available