Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single Institution's Experience in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches
Ser Yee Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS (2015)
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Superior to the Laparoscopic Technique
Mustapha Daouadi et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2013)
Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: A comprehensive review
Eric C. H. Lai et al.
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY (2013)
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Is Associated With Significantly Less Overall Morbidity Compared to the Open Technique A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Raghunandan Venkat et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2012)
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies
Asri C. Jusoh et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2012)
Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages?
Chang Moo Kang et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2011)
Robotic distal pancreatectomy: Cost effective?
Joshua A. Waters et al.
SURGERY (2010)
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience
Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2010)
Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme
Wande B. Pratt et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2007)
Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition
C Bassi et al.
SURGERY (2005)
Share Paper
