4.5 Article

Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data

Journal

JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 178, Issue 11, Pages 1544-1547

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [F32 AR070585, K23 AR063770, P30 AR070155]
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R01 HS024412]
  3. Russell/Engleman Medical Research Center for Arthritis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A promise of machine learning in health care is the avoidance of biases in diagnosis and treatment; a computer algorithm could objectively synthesize and interpret the data in the medical record. Integration of machine learning with clinical decision support tools, such as computerized alerts or diagnostic support, may offer physicians and others who provide health care targeted and timely information that can improve clinical decisions. Machine learning algorithms, however, may also be subject to biases. The biases include those related to missing data and patients not identified by algorithms, sample size and underestimation, and misclassification and measurement error. There is concern that biases and deficiencies in the data used by machine learning algorithms may contribute to socioeconomic disparities in health care. This Special Communication outlines the potential biases that may be introduced into machine learning-based clinical decision support tools that use electronic health record data and proposes potential solutions to the problems of overreliance on automation, algorithms based on biased data, and algorithms that do not provide information that is clinically meaningful. Existing health care disparities should not be amplified by thoughtless or excessive reliance on machines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available