3.9 Article

Responses of distraction regenerate to high-frequency traction at a rapid rate

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages 1035-1039

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823cc867

Keywords

Distraction osteogenesis; continuous distraction; distraction rate; mandible; rabbit

Funding

  1. AO foundation [S-07-76Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Continuous traction is capable of creating an optimal biological environment for bone healing which may finally compensate for the rapid distraction rate in distraction osteogenesis. This study was designed to investigate the response of distraction callus to continuous distraction at a rapid rate using a rabbit model of mandibular lengthening. METHODS: Thirty adult New Zealand white rabbits were randomly assigned to the intermittent (1 step/d) or continuous distraction (8 steps/s) group, with 15 in each. After osteotomy, manual-driven or autodriven distractor was adapted accordingly. The distraction was activated at a rate of 3.0 mm/d for 4 days. Five rabbits in each group were killed at week 2, week 4, and week 12 of consolidation, respectively. Plain radiography, microcomputed tomography, and histology examinations were used to evaluate the bone regeneration status. RESULTS: Plain radiographs and histologic studies demonstrated more advanced bone healing in continuous distraction group than that in intermittent distraction group at all the examined time points. Quantitative microcomputed tomography analysis showed significantly higher bone volume in continuous distraction group at week 2 (p < 0.01) and week 4 (p < 0.05) of consolidation. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous traction by autodriven distractor could be a promising clinical alternative to shorten the treatment course of distraction osteogenesis. Further studies to test its clinical potential using large animals that have similar metabolic rate and muscular resistance with human being are necessary. (J Trauma. 2012; 72: 1035-1039. Copyright (C) 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available