3.9 Article

Caveolin-1 siRNA Increases the Pulmonary Microvascular and Alveolar Epithelial Permeability in Rats

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e7432d

Keywords

caveolae; aquaporins; pulmonary edema; alveolar wall; wet to dry ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Increased pulmonary microvascular and epithelial permeability are important contributors to pulmonary edema in acute lung injury. In this study, we used small interfering RNA (siRNA) to knock down caveolin-1 expression in rat lungs and to confirm the important role of caveolin-1 in regulating pulmonary edema. Method: After pulmonary injection of siRNA against caveolin-1 messenger RNA incorporated in liposomes with three concentrations of 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 mg/kg, the gene silencing rate and the effects of caveolin-1 siRNA on aquaporin (AQP)-1, AQP-5, and epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) were detected. For pulmonary permeability analysis, Evans blue fluorimetry, ratios of albumin concentrations between blood and bronchoalveolar lavage, and wet/dry weight ratios were measured. The impacts of caveolin-1 suppression on interendothelial junctions were evaluated by the performance of electron microscopy and the analysis of vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin Western blot. Alveolar wall thickness analysis and chest fluoroscopy were performed to determine the pulmonary edema degree. Results: After 72 hours of injection, the gene silencing rate of caveolin-1 siRNA is about 87%. AQP-1, AQP-5, ENaC-alpha, ENaC-beta, ENaC-gamma, and VE-cadherin protein levels were decreased by 63%, 66%, 80%, 90%, 89%, and 50%, respectively. Caveolin-1 siRNA also resulted in increasing microvascular and epithelial permeability and pulmonary edema. Conclusion: These data suggest that caveolin-1 plays an important part in regulating the pulmonary permeability by modifying AQP-1, AQP-5, ENaC, and VE-cadherin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available