4.5 Article

The effect of minimal shoes on arch structure and intrinsic foot muscle strength

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORT AND HEALTH SCIENCE
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 74-85

Publisher

SHANGHAI UNIV SPORT
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2014.03.011

Keywords

Endurance running; Foot strength; Foot strike; Intrinsic foot muscles; Longitudinal arch; Minimal support footwear

Funding

  1. Charles Phelps Taft Research Center at the University of Cincinnati

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This prospective study explored the effects of endurance running (ER) in minimal versus standard running shoes on the foot's superficial layer intrinsic muscles and the function of the longitudinal arch. Our hypothesis was that running in minimal shoes would cause hypertrophy in these muscles and lead to higher, stronger, stiffer arches. Methods: The hypothesis was tested using a sample of 33 healthy runners randomized into two groups, a control group shod in traditional running footwear and an experimental group shod in minimal support footwear, whose feet were scanned in an MRI before and after a 12-week training regime. Running kinematics as well as arch stiffness and height were also assessed before and after the treatment period. Results: Analysis of anatomical cross-sectional areas and muscle volumes indicate that the flexor digitorum brevis muscle became larger in both groups by 11% and 21%, respectively, but only the minimally shod runners had significant areal and volumetric increases of the abductor digiti minimi of 18% and 22%, respectively, and significantly increased longitudinal arch stiffness (60%). Conclusion: These results suggest that endurance running in minimal support footwear with 4 mm offset or less makes greater use of the springlike function of the longitudinal arch, thus leading to greater demands on the intrinsic muscles that support the arch, thereby strengthening the foot. Copyright (C) 2014, Shanghai University of Sport. Production and hosting by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available