4.7 Article

Assessing and Reducing the Toxicity of 3D-Printed Parts

Journal

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00249

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation's Instrument Development for Biological Research Program [DBI-1353974]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences [1353974] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1353974] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

3D printing is gaining popularity by providing a tool for fast, cost-effective, and highly customizable fabrication. However, little is known about the toxicity of 3D-printed objects. In this work, we assess the toxicity of printed parts from two main classes of commercial 3D printers, fused deposition modeling and stereo-lithography. We assessed the toxicity of these 3D-printed parts using zebrafish (Dania rerio), a widely used model organism in aquatic toxicology. Zebrafish embryos were exposed to 3D-printed parts and monitored for rates of survival, hatching, and developmental abnormalities. We found that parts from both types of printers were measurably toxic to zebrafish embryos, with STL-printed parts significantly more toxic than FDM-printed parts. We also developed a simple post-printing treatment (exposure to ultraviolet light) that largely mitigates the toxicity of the STL-printed parts. Our results call attention to the need for strategies for the safe disposal of 3D-printed parts and printer waste materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available