3.9 Article

Outcome after Translabyrinthine Surgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Report on 1244 Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages 168-174

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1301403

Keywords

vestibular schwannoma; translabyrinthine surgery; outcome; facial nerve

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this article is to study the outcome after translabyrinthine surgery for vestibular schwannomas, with special focus on the facial nerve function. The study design is a case series from a national centralized database and it is set in two University Hospitals in Denmark. Participants were 1244 patients who underwent translabyrinthine surgery during a period of 33 years from 1976 to 2009. Main outcome measures were tumor removal, intraoperative facial nerve preservation, complications, and postoperative facial nerve function. In 84% patients, the tumor was totally resected and in similar to 85% the nerve was intact during surgery. During 33 years, 12 patients died from complications to surgery and similar to 14% had cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Before surgery, 74 patients had facial paresis and 46% of these improved after surgery. In patients with normal facial function, overall similar to 70% had a good outcome (House-Brackmann grade 1 or 2). The chance of a good outcome was related to tumor size with a higher the chance the smaller the tumor, but not to the degree of tumor removal. In similar to 78% of the patients with facial paresis at discharge the paresis improved over time, in similar to 42% from a poor to a good function. The translabyrinthine approach is generally efficient in tumor control and with satisfactory facial nerve outcome. With larger tumors the risk of a poor outcome is evident and more data on patients managed with alternative strategies are warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available