4.7 Review

The valuation of marine ecosystem goods and services in the Caribbean: A literature review and framework for future valuation efforts

Journal

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages 56-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.013

Keywords

Valuation; Caribbean region; Coastal and marine ecosystems

Funding

  1. Global Environment Facility project Sustainable Management of the Shared Living Marine Resources of the Caribbean Sea Large Marine Ecosystem and Adjacent Regions (CLME Project)
  2. Cameron School of Business at the University of North Carolina Wilmington

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews economic valuation of marine ecosystem services in the Wider Caribbean Region (WCR) for the three major marine ecosystems addressed by the Caribbean Large Marine Ecosystem (CLME) Project: reef, pelagic and continental shelf. A review of over 200 value estimates suggests that marine economic valuations in the WCR have focused on a limited number of benefits derived from marine ecosystems, primarily those that are relatively easy to measure and convey, such as recreation opportunities in protected areas, and benefits that are ascribed to easily measured market indicators. Values associated with reefs have received far more attention than those associated with the pelagic or shelf ecosystems. The economic impacts of overfishing remain largely unexplored. Regulating and maintenance services provided by the marine ecosystems of the WCR have been recognized as important, but have not been linked to valuation. Finally, estimates of non-use values for WCR marine ecosystem goods and services are few. It is suggested that future work on valuation be coordinated among countries and agencies so that gaps can be prioritized and valuation studies can be directed toward a more comprehensive understanding of the full value of the goods and services provided by marine ecosystems in the WCR. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available