4.6 Article

Energetics of charges in organic semiconductors and at organic donor-acceptor interfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 2, Issue 17, Pages 3467-3475

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3tc32475c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. European Research Council (ERC)
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) [CTQ2011-25086/ BQU]
  4. DIUE of the Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR528]
  5. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We calculated the energy landscape of charged molecules that is determined by electrostatic and induction interaction using the fully polarizable force field DRF90 in the bulk and at interfaces of the electron accepting material C-60, and two exemplary electron donating materials pentacene and phthalocyanine. In particular, we compared the energy of a non-interacting electron-hole pair (NI-EH) without mutual electrostatic interactions to the energy of a Coulomb-bound interfacial charge-transfer state (CT). Our calculations show that due to electrostatic interactions with the environment a NI-EH state is destabilized on the phthalocyanine-C-60 interface, whereas it is stabilized on the interface between pentacene and C60, even without the interaction with the counter charge. Upon adding the mutual electrostatic interaction between the opposite charges the electrostatic term overall stabilizes the CT state in both systems. This stabilization is not compensated by the reduced induction term. The resulting binding energy of the CT state amounts to several tenths of an eV, which contradicts the evidence of working solar cells based on these systems. The overestimated CT state binding energy for charges localized on a single molecule suggests that charge delocalization over multiple molecules might play an important role. Nevertheless, our results indicate clear opportunities to engineer electrostatic interactions at the interface that might lead to destabilization of NI-EH and hence to a lower binding energy of CT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available