4.6 Article

A biomimetic collagen-apatite scaffold with a multi-level lamellar structure for bone tissue engineering

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
Volume 2, Issue 14, Pages 1998-2007

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3tb21595d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET 1133883, IPP 1243455]
  2. National Institute of Health [1R21AR059962-01A1]
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1133883] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Collagen-apatite (Col-Ap) scaffolds have been widely employed for bone tissue engineering. We fabricated Col-Ap with a unique multi-level lamellar structure consisting of co-aligned micro- and macro-pores. The basic building blocks of this scaffold are bone-like mineralized collagen fibers developed via a biomimetic self-assembly process in a collagen-containing modified simulated body fluid (m-SBF). This biomimetic method preserves the structural integrity and great tensile strength of collagen by reinforcing the collagen hydrogel with apatite nano-particles. Unidirectional aligned macro-pores with a size of 63.8 to 344 mu m are created by controlling the freezing rate and direction. The thickness of Col-Ap lamellae can be adjusted in the range 3.6 to 23 mm depending on the self-compression time. Furthermore, the multi-level lamellar structure has led to a twelve-fold increase in Young's modulus and a two-fold increase in the compression modulus along the aligned direction compared to a scaffold of the same composition with an isotropic equiaxed pore structure. Moreover, this novel lamellar scaffold supports the attachment and spreading of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. Therefore, owing to the biomimetic composition, tunable structure, improved mechanical strength and good biocompatibility of this novel scaffold, it has great potential to be used in bone tissue engineering applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available