4.6 Article

Simultaneous electrochemical detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid based on nitrogen doped porous carbon nanopolyhedra

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
Volume 1, Issue 21, Pages 2742-2749

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3tb20215a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC [21275041, 21235002]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of NSFC [21221003]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [12JJ2010]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20110161110009]
  5. PCSIRT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen doped porous carbon nanopolyhedra (N-PCNPs) were prepared from direct carbonization of ZIF-8 nanopolyhedra. The N-PCNPs showed uniform morphology, narrow pore-size distribution centered at 3.7 nm, high surface area (2221 m(2) g(-1)) and good electrochemical properties and were used to modify a glassy carbon electrode to electrochemically detect ascorbic acid (AA), dopamine (DA) and uric acid (UA). Compared with the bare GC electrode and reduced graphene oxide modified glassy carbon (rGO/GC) electrode, the N-PCNPs modified GC electrode (N-PCNPs/GC) was found to perform better toward electrocatalytic oxidation of AA, DA and UA. For simultaneous sensing of three analytes, three well-separated voltammetry peaks were obtained using the N-PCNPs/GC electrode in differential pulse voltammetry measurements, and the corresponding peak separations between AA and DA, DA and UA were 228 mV, 124 mV respectively. The linear response ranges for the determination of AA, DA and UA were 80-2000 mu M, 0.5-30 mu M and 4-50 mu M, respectively, and the detection limits (S/N = 3) were 740 nM, 11 nM and 21 nM, respectively. Furthermore, the N-PCNPs/GC electrode showed good reproducibility and stability. The attractive features of N-PCNPs provided potential applications in the simultaneous determination of UA, AA and DA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available