4.6 Article

Adjusting the yolk-shell structure of carbon spheres to boost the capacitive K+ storage ability

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 6, Issue 46, Pages 23318-23325

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta07438k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21571189, 21771062]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2018JJ4002]
  3. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Major Project of China [2017GK1040]
  4. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project of China [2017TP1001]
  5. Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2016CXS009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon materials continue to be a focus of rapid innovative application in potassium-ion batteries (KIBs) owing to their abundant resources. However, K+ storage of carbon electrodes is limited by the intercalation chemistry which brings a large structural change and sluggish potassiation kinetics. In this work, we synthesized a series of hierarchical porous yolk-shell carbon sphere (HYCS) materials through an extended Stober reaction. By controlling the concentration of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), their morphologies, including pore volume, specific surface area and yolk ratios, can be well adjusted. Quantitative analysis reveals that these adjusted materials show enhanced capacitive behavior, which leads to fast reaction kinetics and enhanced K+ adsorption capability. Furthermore, the capacitance contribution can be controlled through adjusting the yolk-shell nanostructures. The optimized sample with the largest pore volume (1.47 cm(3) g(-1)) and the highest specific surface area (703.1 cm(2) g(-1)) possesses the best rate performance with capacities of 314 and 121 mA h g(-1) at 50 and 5000 mA g(-1), respectively. These achievements signify that structural adjustment is an effective approach for constructing high-performance K+ storage materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available