4.6 Article

Theory of mass transport in sodium alanate

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 2, Issue 12, Pages 4438-4448

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ta14692h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-07ER46433]
  2. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sodium alanate, NaAlH4, is a well-known hydrogen storage material that decomposes into Na3AlH6 and Al while releasing H-2 as a gas. While the thermodynamics of this reaction are ideal for applications in fuel cell vehicles, the reaction rates are prohibitively slow unless the material is doped with transition metals (such as titanium) or rare earths (such as cerium). It has been widely theorized that the flux of point defects through the bulk phases provides the mechanism for long-range metal transport which accompanies the hydrogen release and absorption reactions. In this paper, a quantitative model is introduced to describe mass transport using point defect energies obtained from first-principles density-functional theory (DFT) calculations. It is found that negatively charged sodium vacancies in Na3AlH6 have the largest flux of all metal-site defects in any of the phases, at all temperatures examined. Positively charged hydrogen vacancies are predicted to balance the charge of sodium vacancies and have a higher diffusivity than this metal defect. The activation energy for the formation and diffusion of sodium vacancies in Na3AlH6 is found to be equal to 50 kJ mol(-1) for rehydrogenation and 70 kJ mol(-1) for dehydrogenation, in good agreement with experimental values. It is argued that diffusion of sodium vacancies in Na3AlH6 represents the rate-limiting process in the dehydrogenation of Ti-doped NaAlH4 and that Ti must catalyze some other process (or processes) than bulk mass transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available