4.6 Article

Flexible CoO-graphene-carbon nanofiber mats as binder-free anodes for lithium-ion batteries with superior rate capacity and cyclic stability

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 2, Issue 16, Pages 5890-5897

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta00311j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI-1030048]
  2. NESAC/BIO [EB-002027]
  3. University of Washington TGIF grant
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61376073, 21103046]
  5. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [10JJ1011, 11JJ7004]
  6. China Scholarship Council
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flexible mats composed of CoO-graphene-carbon nanofibers have been prepared by electrospinning and a subsequent thermal treatment. The flexible mats of CoO-graphene-carbon annealed at 650 degrees C exhibited discharge capacities of 760 and 690 mA h g(-1) at the 252nd and 352nd cycle, respectively, at a current density of 500 mA g(-1), which are much higher than those of pure carbon, graphene-carbon, and CoO-carbon nanofibers at the respective cycles. The CoO-graphene-carbon nanofibers can deliver a discharge capacity of 400 mA h g(-1) at a current density of 2 A g(-1), which is also higher than the values obtain for CoO-carbon and graphene-carbon nanofibers. The improved electrochemical properties of the flexible CoO-graphene-carbon nanofiber mats could be ascribed to the framework, which allows for fast diffusion of Li+, the presence of graphene, which enhances the conductivity and the mechanical properties of the mats, and the defective sites that arise from the introduced CoO and graphene which can store Li+. It is believed that the electrospinning method used to combine the material with graphene could be a useful approach to prepare flexible mats for lithium-ion batteries, supercapacitors, and fuel cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available