4.6 Article

High-performance SrNb0.1Co0.9-xFexO3-delta perovskite cathodes for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 2, Issue 37, Pages 15454-15462

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta03208j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China National Funds to Distinguished Young Scientists [51025209]
  2. Outstanding Young Scholar Grant at Jiangsu Province [2008023]
  3. Fok Ying Tung Education Grant [111073]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Chinese Ministry of Education
  5. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB209704]
  6. Australian Research Council (ARC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical to electrical energy conversion using a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) becomes more practical as the operating temperature is lowered to 600 degrees C and below. Given the thermally activated nature of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathode side, development of cathode catalysts with very low polarisation resistance is essential. Here, we showed that partial substitution of Co within SrNb0.1Co0.9O3-delta by Fe (up to 0.5) triggers the formation of oxygen non-stoichiometry while preserving the primitive cubic lattice, thus substantially enhancing the ORR performance below 600 degrees C (relative to the parent compound). Close correlation between the oxygen non-stoichiometry and ORR activity trends was found to some extent. SrNb0.1Co0.7Fe0.2O3-delta (SNCF0.2) cathode exhibits a very low area specific resistance value of 0.052 Omega cm(2) at 600 degrees C which translates to superior fuel cell performance, e. g. peak power density of 1587 mW cm(-2) at 600 degrees C. Moreover, the synergistic relationship between ORR activity, thermal expansion coefficient and enhanced CO2 resistance attests to the significance of the SNCF cathode. The last attribute is envisioned as a dominant factor for applications using alternative fuels (e. g. CO which normally contains CO2) and in a portable single-chamber SOFC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available