4.6 Article

Prussian blue analogues: a new class of anode materials for lithium ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 2, Issue 16, Pages 5852-5857

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta00062e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) [2014CB239701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21173120, 51372116]
  3. Natural Science Foundations of Jiangsu Province [BK2011030]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NP2014403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted extensive interest in the context of energy storage due to their high surface areas, controllable structures and excellent electrochemical properties. In particular, Prussian blue analogues (PBAs) have recently gained attention as a new class of cathode materials for rechargeable batteries. However, the anode properties of the host framework have been very limited. Herein, we demonstrate that nanoparticles of cobalt hexacyanocobaltate and manganese hexacyanocobaltate, typical Prussian blue analogues with the chemical formula M-3(II)[Co-III(CN)(6)](2)center dot nH(2)O (M Co, Mn), can be operated as novel battery anodes in an organic liquid-carbonate electrolyte. The Co-3[Co(CN)(6)](2) material exhibits a clear electrochemical activity in the voltage range of 0.01-3 V vs. Li/Li+ with a reversible capacity of 299.1 mA h g(-1). Furthermore, superior rate capability (as the current density increases from 20 to 2000 mA g(-1), the capacity retains about 34%) could be achieved, attributing to the small particle sizes and rapid transport of Li+ ions through large channels in the open-framework. We believe that this work provides a new insight into the electrochemical properties of PBAs and opens new perspectives to develop anode materials for rechargeable batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available