4.6 Article

High-performance supercapacitor electrode based on a polyaniline nanofibers/3D graphene framework as an efficient charge transporter

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 2, Issue 14, Pages 4989-4998

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ta14959e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Futuristic Fundamental Research Program [2E23831-13-095]
  2. Korea Institute of Science and Technology
  3. Pioneer Research Center Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [2010-0019313]
  4. Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [2009-0093823]
  5. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current paper describes chemically grown polyaniline (PANI) nanofibers on porous three dimensional graphene (PANI/3D graphene) as a supercapacitor electrode material with enhanced electrochemical performance. The chemical and structural properties of the electrode are characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Raman spectroscopy with confirmation of a semi-crystalline nature. The homogeneous growth of PANI on the 3D graphene network is visualized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and shows a nanofibers-based morphology. The maximum specific capacitance of the PANI/3D graphene electrode is found to be similar to 1024 F g(-1) in 1 M H2SO4 within the potential window of 150 to 800 mV vs. Ag/AgCl at 10 mV s(-1) scan rate (similar to 1002 F g(-1) at 1 mA cm(-2) discharge current density). The high surface area offered by the conducting, porous 3D graphene framework stimulates effective utilization of the deposited PANI and improves electrochemical charge transport and storage. This signifies that the 3D graphene framework is a proficient contender for high-performance capacitor electrodes in energy storage applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available