4.6 Article

How dopant size influences the protonic energy landscape in BaSn1-xMxO3-x/2 (M = Ga, Sc, In, Y, Gd, La)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 460-471

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ta12870a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GENCI-CCRT/CINES [2012-096468, 2013-096468]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche through the project IDEA-MAT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The energy landscape of the protonic defect is investigated in acceptor-doped barium stannate using density-functional calculations. Several trivalent dopants are studied (Ga, Sc, In, Y, Gd, La), covering a wide range of ionic radii. All the dopants are found attractive with respect to the proton, with (negative) association energies varying from -0.40 to -0.07 eV. A radius r(c1) is defined to separate the small dopants that induce tensile stress from the large ones that induce compressive stress in the host matrix (r(c1) approximate to 0.72 angstrom). The protonic energy surface exhibits a non-trivial evolution with ionic radius of the dopant: for low dopant radii, the most stable protonic site is the oxygen first-neighbor of the dopant, while for high dopant radii, the most stable position is obtained when the proton is bonded to an oxygen second-neighbor of the dopant. This evolution of the protonic energy surface with dopant ionic radius is smooth and the transition takes place between In and Y, i.e. for a critical radius r(c2) between 0.80 and 0.90 angstrom (r(c2) > r(c1) significantly). The dopant-proton association energy exhibits a minimal value approximate to -0.07 eV (weakest attraction) at this transition, i.e. in the case of yttrium, for which the first-neighbor and second-neighbor positions are almost degenerate. Other dopants, smaller or larger, are more attractive to protons. The present study gives useful information about the modification of the trapping effect according to the dopant ionic size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available