4.6 Article

Nanostructural dependence of hydrogen production in silicon photocathodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 1, Issue 17, Pages 5414-5422

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ta00048f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Converging Research Center Program through the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012K001290]
  2. Basic Science Research Program [2011-0001225]
  3. Global Frontier R&D Program on Center for Multiscale Energy System [2011-0031574]
  4. National Research Foundation under the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogen production from solar power energy is an important energy and environmental issue. Silicon (Si) has been widely studied as a photocathode for hydrogen production from water splitting. In this study, the electrochemical behavior of a Si photocathode for water splitting is highly dependent on its nanostructure. The optimum nanostructure of a Si photocathode exhibits an enhanced photocurrent and a lower overpotential compared to the planar bulk Si. The limiting current density of nanostructured Si is 1.58 times greater than that of the planar structure for p-type Si/aqueous electrolyte solution. Nanostructured Si without any catalyst notably produced a current density of -10.65 mA cm(-2) under Air Mass 1.5 Global conditions with a light intensity of 100 mW cm(-2) at the reversible potential vs. reversible hydrogen electrode, which is about 43 times higher than that of the untreated Si structure. The solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of the optimized Si nanowire without depositing any catalyst has reached up to about 70% of the efficiency of planar Si decorated with Pt. This significant enhancement achieved in this study emphasizes the importance of a controlled nanostructure in the development of highly efficient photoelectrochemical devices for hydrogen production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available