4.6 Article

Graphene-encapsulated sulfur (GES) composites with a core-shell structure as superior cathode materials for lithium-sulfur batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 1, Issue 47, Pages 15142-15149

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ta13541a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SCUT20120042]
  2. Key Strategic Project [2011B05030008]
  3. China postdoctoral science foundation [2013T60795]
  4. NNFSC [21176045, 21376090]
  5. Fok Ying Tung Foundation [NRC07/08.EG01]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of China
  7. Guangdong Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Relatively uniform sized graphene-encapsulated sulphur (GES) composites with a core (S)-shell (graphene) structure were synthesized in one pot based on a solution-chemical reaction-deposition method. These novel GES particles were characterized by XRD, Raman spectrometry, SEM, TGA, EDS and TEM. The electrochemical tests showed that the present GES composites exhibit high specific capacity, good discharge capacity retention and superior rate capability when they were employed as cathodes in rechargeable Li-S cells. A high sulphur content (83.3 wt%) was obtained in the GES composites. Stable discharge capacities of about 900, 650, 540 and 480 mA h g(-1) were achieved at 0.75, 2.0, 3.0 and 6.0 C, respectively. The good electrochemical performance is attributed to the high electrical conductivity of the graphene, the reasonable particle size of sulphur particles, and the core-shell structures that have synergistic effects on facilitating good transport of electrons from the poorly conducting sulphur, preserving fast transport of lithium ions to the encapsulated sulphur particles, and alleviating the polysulfide shuttle phenomenon. The present finding may provide a significant contribution to the enhancement of cathodes for the lithium-sulphur battery technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available