4.6 Article

Facile synthesis of a continuous thin Cu(bipy)2(SiF6) membrane with selectivity towards hydrogen

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 1, Issue 37, Pages 11438-11442

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ta11604b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB821700]
  2. Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project of NSFC [21120102034]
  3. NSFC [20831002]
  4. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT100101059]
  5. International Cooperation Special Fund from the Ministry of Science and Technology, PRC [2011DFR10320]
  6. Open Fund by State Key Laboratory of Laser Interaction with Matter, PRC [SKLLIM1111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cu(bipy)(2)(SiF6) is a highly porous metal-organic framework (MOF) and represents a prototypal pillared sheet platform offering opportunities to control the pore sizes. Its structural features, low cost and facile synthesis make it a great candidate to fabricate membranes for gas separation. The key to obtaining thin, continuous Cu(bipy)(2)(SiF6) membranes is to control the Cu(bipy)(2)(SiF6) crystal growth and enhance the binding between membrane and substrate. Here we explored a new route by direct synthesis and successfully obtained a continuous thin Cu(bipy)(2)(SiF6) membrane on a macroporous glass-frit disk with high robustness. It is speculated that the SiF62- used to construct the Cu(bipy)(2)(SiF6) membrane came from the fluorinated substrate. The Cu(bipy)(2)(SiF6) membrane shows the separation factors of H-2-CO2, H-2-CH4 and H-2-N-2 are 8.0, 7.5, and 6.8 respectively at 293 K and 1 bar with H-2 permeance of 2.7 x 10(-7) mol m(-2) s(-1) Pa-1 as well as high thermal stability. We expect to explore more membranes of Cu(bipy)(2)(SiF6) analogues with tuneable pore sizes using this route and to obtain membranes with higher gas separation performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available