4.4 Article

Strong subadditivity, null energy condition and charged black holes

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2014)084

Keywords

Gauge-gravity correspondence; Black Holes in String Theory; AdS-CFT Correspondence

Funding

  1. CONACyT [CB-2008-01-104649]
  2. National Science Foundation [PHY-0969020]
  3. Texas Cosmology Center
  4. Simons postdoctoral fellowship
  5. Simons Foundation
  6. University of Texas
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Physics [1316033] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division Of Physics
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0969020] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the Hubeny-Rangamani-Takayanagi (HRT) conjectured formula for entanglement entropy in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence with time-dependent backgrounds, we investigate the relation between the bulk null energy condition (NEC) of the stress-energy tensor with the strong sub-additivity (SSA) property of entanglement entropy in the boundary theory. In a background that interpolates between an AdS to an AdS-Reissner-Nordstrom-type geometry, we find that generically there always exists a critical surface beyond which the violation of NEC would naively occur. However, the extremal area surfaces that determine the entanglement entropy for the boundary theory, can penetrate into this forbidden region only for certain choices for the mass and the charge functions in the background. This penetration is then perceived as the violation of SSA in the boundary theory. We also find that this happens only when the critical surface lies above the apparent horizon, but not otherwise. We conjecture that SSA, which is thus non-trivially related to NEC, also characterizes the entire time-evolution process along which the dual field theory may thermalize.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available