4.4 Article

Comprehensive study of two Higgs doublet models in light of the new boson with mass around 125 GeV

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2013)075

Keywords

Higgs Physics; Beyond Standard Model

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korea government of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [2011-0003287]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the NRF
  4. MEST [2010-0010916, 2011-0010294, 2011-0029758, R31-2008-000-10057-0]
  5. Basic Science Research Program through the NRF of Korea
  6. WCU program through the KOSEF
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0010294, 2011-0029758, R31-2012-000-10057-0, 2010-0010916] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new boson of mass roughly 125 GeV has been recently reported by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations. Although its signals in various decay modes resemble those of the standard model (SM) Higgs boson, observed are the combinations of entangled information about the production, decay rates and total decay width of the new boson. In addition, some decay channels show non-negligible deviation from the SM expectation, such as the 2 sigma excess in the diphoton channel. In the four types (I, II, X and Y) of two Higgs doublet models, we perform the global chi(2) fit in three scenarios: (i) the new boson is the light CP-even Higgs boson h(0); (ii) it is the heavy CP-even Higgs boson H-0; (iii) the signals are from the degenerate state of h(0) and the pseudoscalar A(0). Considering other phenomenological constraints such as flavor physics, electroweak precision data, and the LEP search for the Higgs boson, we find that the first scenarios in Type II provides the best fit. And the other models are also as good as the SM in explaining the LHC Higgs data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available