4.4 Review

Event generation with SHERPA 1.1

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/02/007

Keywords

QCD Phenomenology; Phenomenological Models

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  2. HEPTOOLS Marie Curie Research Training Network [MRTN-CT-2006-035505]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020-117602]
  4. MC-net [MRTN-CT-2006-035606]
  5. UK Sience and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  6. Fermi Research Alliance, LLC [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  7. BMBF
  8. STFC [ST/G000905/1, ST/G000522/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G000905/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper the current release of the Monte Carlo event generator Sherpa, version 1.1, is presented. Sherpa is a general-purpose tool for the simulation of particle collisions at high-energy colliders. It contains a very flexible tree-level matrix-element generator for the calculation of hard scattering processes within the Standard Model and various new physics models. The emission of additional QCD partons off the initial and final states is described through a parton-shower model. To consistently combine multi-parton matrix elements with the QCD parton cascades the approach of Catani, Krauss, Kuhn and Webber is employed. A simple model of multiple interactions is used to account for underlying events in hadron-hadron collisions. The fragmentation of partons into primary hadrons is described using a phenomenological cluster-hadronisation model. A comprehensive library for simulating tau-lepton and hadron decays is provided. Where available form-factor models and matrix elements are used, allowing for the inclusion of spin correlations; effects of virtual and real QED corrections are included using the approach of Yennie, Frautschi and Suura.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available