4.4 Article

αs and the τ hadronic width:: fixed-order, contour-improved and higher-order perturbation theory

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/044

Keywords

renormalization group; QCD; renormalization regularization and renormalons

Funding

  1. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The determination of alpha(s) from hadronic tau decays is revisited, with a special emphasis on the question of higher-order perturbative corrections and different possibilities of resumming the perturbative series with the renormalisation group: fixed-order (FOPT) vs. contour-improved perturbation theory (CIPT). The difference between these approaches has evolved into a systematic effect that does not go away as higher orders in the perturbative expansion are added. We attempt to clarify under which circumstances one or the other approach provides a better approximation to the true result. To this end, we propose to describe the Adler function series by a model that includes the exactly known coefficients and theoretical constraints on the large-order behaviour originating from the operator product expansion and the renormalisation group. Within this framework we find that while CIPT is unable to account for the fully resummed series, FOPT smoothly approaches the Borel sum, before the expected divergent behaviour sets in at even higher orders. Employing FOPT up to the fifth order to determine alpha(s) in the (MS) over bar MS scheme, we obtain alpha s(M-tau) = 0.320+ 0.012-0.007, corresponding to alpha(s)(M-Z) = 0.1185+ 0.0014-0.0009. Improving this result by including yet higher orders from our model yields alpha(s)(M-tau) = 0.316 +/- 0.006, which after evolution leads to alpha(s)(M-Z) = 0.1180 +/- 0.0008. Our results are lower than previous values obtained from tau decays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available