4.3 Article

Effect of extraction conditions on total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of Carica papaya leaf aqueous extracts

Journal

JOURNAL OF HERBAL MEDICINE
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 104-111

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.hermed.2013.04.004

Keywords

Antioxidant; Bioactive components; Extraction; Papaya leaves; Polyphenols

Funding

  1. Ramaciotti Foundation [ES2012/0104]
  2. Cancer Australia and Cure Cancer Australia Foundation [1033781]
  3. Cancer Institute NSW [09/CDF/2-40]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The leaves of Carica papaya are generally considered waste but their extracts have been linked with various health benefits. This study aimed to optimize extraction conditions and determine the effect of aqueous extraction on the yield of polyphenols from papaya leaves. The efficiency of water extraction was compared to the organic solvents acetone, ethanol and methanol. A method to prepare crude powder from the leaves was developed, with its composition and antioxidant properties also examined. We show that temperature, extraction time and water-to-leaf ratio had significant effects on the extracted polyphenol yield as well as the scavenging and total antioxidant activities. Optimal extraction conditions were 70 degrees C for 20 min, with a water-to-leaf ratio of 100:7.5 mL/g. Higher levels of polyphenols were extracted using water in comparison to the organic solvents, while ethanol extraction provided the highest level of saponins. A simple and scalable method was developed to obtain approximately 190 g of powder from 1 kg of dried papaya leaves. The crude powder contained 6.3% polyphenols, and when compared to butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), Vitamins C and E and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) had lower scavenging and total antioxidant activity. However, as this method used water for extraction, it is considered safe and offers great potential for further purification and application in future studies. (C) 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available