4.6 Review

Evidence-Based Guidelines for Precision Risk Stratification-Based Screening (PRSBS) for Colorectal Cancer: Lessons Learned from the US Armed Forces: Consensus and Future Directions

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 172-192

Publisher

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.5834

Keywords

cancer screening; risk identification; colon; rectal; colorectal cancer; evidence-based medicine; consensus

Categories

Funding

  1. Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center
  2. Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine
  3. California Oncology Research Institute
  4. INCORE
  5. International Consortium of Research Excellence of the Theodor-Billroth-Academy [TBA (R)]
  6. United States Military Cancer Institute
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA170533] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States (U. S.), with estimates of 143,460 new cases and 51,690 deaths for the year 2012. Numerous organizations have published guidelines for CRC screening; however, these numerical estimates of incidence and disease-specific mortality have remained stable from years prior. Technological, genetic profiling, molecular and surgical advances in our modern era should allow us to improve risk stratification of patients with CRC and identify those who may benefit from preventive measures, early aggressive treatment, alternative treatment strategies, and/or frequent surveillance for the early detection of disease recurrence. To better negotiate future economic constraints and enhance patient outcomes, ultimately, we propose to apply the principals of personalized and precise cancer care to risk-stratify patients for CRC screening (Precision Risk Stratification-Based Screening, PRSBS). We believe that genetic, molecular, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities impact oncological outcomes in general, those related to CRC, in particular. This document highlights evidence-based screening recommendations and risk stratification methods in response to our CRC working group private-public consensus meeting held in March 2012. Our aim was to address how we could improve CRC risk stratification-based screening, and to provide a vision for the future to achieving superior survival rates for patients diagnosed with CRC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available