4.6 Article

Secreted Wnt Modulators in Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.112.002261

Keywords

aortic stenosis; mortality; prognosis; Wnt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Valve calcification and inflammation play key roles in the development of aortic stenosis (AS). The Wnt pathways have been linked to inflammation, bone metabolism, angiogenesis, and heart valve formation. We hypothesized that soluble Wnt modulators may be dysregulated in symptomatic AS. Methods and Results-We measured circulating levels (n=136) and aortic valve tissue expression (n=16) of the secreted Wnt modulators secreted frizzled related protein-3, dickkopf-1 (DKK-1), and Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (WIF-1) by enzyme immunoassay, immunostaining, and RT-PCR in patients with symptomatic, severe AS and investigated associations with echocardiographic parameters of AS and cardiac function. Finally, we assessed the prognostic value of these Wnt modulators in relation to all-cause mortality (n=35) during long-term follow-up (median 4.6 years; survivors, 4.8 years; nonsurvivors, 1.9 years) in these patients. Our main findings were: (1) serum levels of all Wnt modulators were markedly elevated in patients with symptomatic AS (mean increase 231% to 278%, P<0.001), (2) all Wnt modulators were present in calcified aortic valves but correlated poorly with systemic levels or degree of AS, (3) some modulators (ie, WIF-1) were associated with the degree of myocardial function and valvular calcification, (4) all Wnt modulators, and DKK-1 in particular, predicted long-term mortality in these patients also after adjusting for conventional predictors including NT-proBNP. Conclusions-Together, these in vivo data support the involvement of Wnt signaling in the development of AS and suggest that circulating Wnt modulators should be further investigated as risk markers in larger AS populations, including patients with asymptomatic disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available