4.5 Article

Analysis of Soil Strength Degradation during Episodes of Cyclic Loading, Illustrated by the T-Bar Penetration Test

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 117-123

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000041

Keywords

Clays; Shear strength; Strain softening; Soil-pipe interaction; Offshore pipelines

Funding

  1. Centre of Excellence
  2. State Government of Western Australia
  3. Western Australia Energy Research Alliance (WA:ERA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pipelines and risers form an essential part of the infrastructure associated with offshore oil and gas facilities. During installation and operation, these structures are subjected to repetitive motions which can cause the surrounding seabed soil to be remolded and soften. This disturbance leads to significant changes in the operative shear strength, which must be assessed in design. This paper presents an analytical framework that aims to quantify the degradation in undrained shear strength as a result of gross disturbance-in this case through repeated vertical movement of a cylindrical object embedded in undrained soil. The parameters of the framework were calibrated using data obtained in a geotechnical centrifuge test. In this test a T-bar penetrometer, which is a cylindrical tool used to characterize the strength of soft soil, was cycled vertically in soil with strength characteristics typical of a deep water seabed. Using simple assumptions regarding the spatial distribution of damage resulting from movement of the cylinder, and by linking this damage to the changing undrained shear strength via a simple degradation model, the framework is shown to simulate well the behavior observed in a cyclic T-bar test. This framework can potentially be extended to the similar near-surface behavior associated with seabed pipelines and risers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available