4.5 Article

Planck intermediate results. XXVI. Optical identification and redshifts of Planck clusters with the RTT150 telescope

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 582, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424674

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; catalogs

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [13-02-12250-ofi-m, 13-02-01464, 14-22-03111-ofi-m]
  2. Russian Academy of Sciences [P-21, OPhN-17]
  3. Russian Government [02.A03.21.0002]
  4. NASA
  5. CNES
  6. CNRS
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000768/1, ST/L001314/1, ST/N000056/1, ST/K004131/1, ST/K001051/1, ST/K000985/1, ST/I005765/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. UK Space Agency [ST/N001206/1, ST/G003874/1, ST/J004812/1, ST/K003674/1, ST/M007685/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of approximately three years of observations of Planck Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) sources with the Russian-Turkish 1.5m telescope (RTT150), as a part of the optical follow-up programme undertaken by the Planck collaboration. During this time period approximately 20% of all dark and grey clear time available at the telescope was devoted to observations of Planck objects. Some observations of distant clusters were also done at the 6 m Bolshoi Telescope Alt-azimutalnyi (BTA) of the Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences. In total, deep, direct images of more than one hundred fields were obtained in multiple filters. We identified 47 previously unknown galaxy clusters, 41 of which are included in the Planck catalogue of SZ sources. The redshifts of 65 Planck clusters were measured spectroscopically and 14 more were measured photometrically. We discuss the details of cluster optical identifications and redshift measurements. We also present new spectroscopic redshifts for 39 Planck clusters that were not included in the Planck SZ source catalogue and are published here for the first time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available