4.7 Article

Dissipative Fuzzy Tracking Control for Nonlinear Networked Systems With Quantization

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS
Volume 50, Issue 12, Pages 5130-5141

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2866996

Keywords

Quantization (signal); Output feedback; Communication channels; Nonlinear control systems; Fuzzy systems; Fuzzy logic; Dissipative tracking control; nonlinear networked systems; quantization; Takagi– Sugeno (T– S) fuzzy systems

Funding

  1. Overseas Scholarship Program for Graduate Students by the Wuhan University of Science and Technology
  2. Basic Science Research Programs through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education [NRF-2017R1A2B2004671]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [4220200113789] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the quantized static output feedback dissipative tracking control problem is considered for a class of discrete-time nonlinear networked systems based on Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model approach. The measurement output of the system, the output of the reference model, and the control input signals will be quantized by static quantizers before them being transmitted to the controller and the plant, respectively. The attention of this paper is focused on the design of the static output feedback tracking controller to asymptotically stabilize the nonlinear networked system and achieve strictly dissipative tracking performance subject to the quantization effects. Sufficient conditions for the existence of the static output feedback strictly dissipative tracking controller are expressed in terms of linear matrix inequalities. Two simulation examples are provided to show the effectiveness of the developed design method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available