4.7 Article

Online Coordinated Charging Decision Algorithm for Electric Vehicles Without Future Information

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 2810-2824

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2014.2346925

Keywords

Competitive ratio; online algorithm; optimal charging control; plug-in electrical vehicle; smart grid; worst-case analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61201262]
  2. National Basic Research Program (973 program) [2013CB336700]
  3. Research Grants Council Direct Research [2050515]
  4. Chinese University of Hong Kong [4055033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The large-scale integration of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) to the power grid spurs the need for efficient charging coordination mechanisms. It can be shown that the optimal charging schedule smooths out the energy consumption over time so as to minimize the total energy cost. In practice, however, it is hard to smooth out the energy consumption perfectly, because the future PEV charging demand is unknown at the moment when the charging rate of an existing PEV needs to be determined. In this paper, we propose an online coordinated charging decision ( ORCHARD) algorithm, which minimizes the energy cost without knowing the future information. Through rigorous proof, we show that ORCHARD is strictly feasible in the sense that it guarantees to fulfill all charging demands before due time. Meanwhile, it achieves the best known competitive ratio of 2.39. By exploiting the problem structure, we propose a novel reduced-complexity algorithm to replace the standard convex optimization techniques used in ORCHARD. Through extensive simulations, we show that the average performance gap between ORCHARD and the offline optimal solution, which utilizes the complete future information, is as small as 6.5%. By setting a proper speeding factor, the average performance gap can be further reduced to 5%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available