4.6 Article

Corner Sort for Pareto-Based Many-Objective Optimization

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 92-102

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2013.2247594

Keywords

Corner sort; many-objective optimization; nondominated sort; Pareto-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA)

Funding

  1. EU FP7 IRSES under Grant on Nature Inspired Computation and its Applications (NICaiA) [247619]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61001202]
  3. National Research Foundation for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20100203120008]
  4. Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nondominated sorting plays an important role in Pareto-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs). When faced with many-objective optimization problems multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) with more than three objectives, the number of comparisons needed in nondominated sorting becomes very large. In view of this, a new corner sort is proposed in this paper. Corner sort first adopts a fast and simple method to obtain a nondominated solution from the corner solutions, and then uses the nondominated solution to ignore the solutions dominated by it to save comparisons. Obtaining the nondominated solutions requires much fewer objective comparisons in corner sort. In order to evaluate its performance, several state-of-the-art nondominated sorts are compared with our corner sort on three kinds of artificial solution sets of MOPs and the solution sets generated from MOEAs on benchmark problems. On one hand, the experiments on artificial solution sets show the performance on the solution sets with different distributions. On the other hand, the experiments on the solution sets generated from MOEAs show the influence that different sorts bring to MOEAs. The results show that corner sort performs well, especially on many-objective optimization problems. Corner sort uses fewer comparisons than others.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available