4.5 Article

Optimal Orientation and Tilt Angle for Maximizing in-Plane Solar Irradiation for PV Applications in Singapore

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 647-653

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2292743

Keywords

Irradiation maximization; optimal tilt angle; orientation; PV modules; solar irradiance

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore (NUS)
  2. Singapore's National Research Foundation (NRF) through the Singapore Economic Development Board
  3. NRF [NRF2008EWT-CERP02-031]
  4. NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of photovoltaic (PV) modules and systems is affected by the orientation and tilt angle, as these parameters determine the amount of solar radiation received by the surface of a PV module in a specific region. In this study, three sky models (Liu and Jordan, Klucher, and Perez et al.) are used to estimate the tilted irradiance, which would be received by a PV module at different orientations and tilt angles from the measured global horizontal irradiance (GHI) and diffuse horizontal irradiance (DHI) in Singapore (1.37 degrees N, 103.75 degrees E). Modeled results are compared with measured values from irradiance sensors facing 60 degrees NE, tilted at 10 degrees, 20 degrees, 30 degrees, 40 degrees, and vertically tilted irradiance sensors facing north, south, east, and west in Singapore. Using the Perez et al. model, it is found that a module facing east gives the maximum annual tilted irradiation for Singapore's climatic conditions. These findings are further validated by one-year comprehensive monitoring of four PV systems (tilted at 10 degrees facing north, south, east, and west) deployed in Singapore. The PV system tilted 10 degrees facing east demonstrated the highest specific yield, with the performance ratio close to those of other orientations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available